Post-Mortem
A post-mortem is the analysis and discussion of a completed chess game, usually by the players, to identify mistakes, better moves, and lessons learned.
- Category
- Strategy
- Difficulty
- Intermediate
- Also known as
- post-game analysis, game analysis, postmortem, post mortem, game review, analysis session, debrief
Post-mortem is the review of a finished chess game, most often by the two players together, to understand what happened and extract lessons.
The discussion usually starts right after the game or soon afterward. Players retrace the key moments, point out mistakes, and explore better alternatives. The goal is improved understanding rather than proving who was right.
Why post-mortems matter
Club players improve fastest when they examine their own games. A post-mortem reveals recurring weaknesses—such as missing candidate moves in sharp positions or misjudging pawn-structure changes—that engine checks alone often miss. Talking through the game also trains the habit of thinking in concrete variations rather than general impressions.
How to conduct one well
- Begin with the opening and note where the game left known theory.
- Identify two or three critical moments; for each, ask what both sides missed and what the strongest replies were.
- Keep the tone collaborative. Treat every position as a shared puzzle rather than a contest of egos.
- Finish by stating one or two concrete lessons (for example, “I must check checks and captures before every move in time trouble”).
When engines are available, use them only after the human discussion. Let the engine confirm or refute ideas rather than replace thinking. If the opponent is unavailable, a quiet solo review with a scoresheet or database still counts as a post-mortem and remains one of the most effective training habits at club level.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a post-mortem in chess?
- A post-mortem is the review of a finished chess game, most often by the two players together, to understand what happened and extract lessons.
- Why should players analyze their games in a post-mortem?
- Club players improve fastest when they examine their own games soon after play, revealing recurring weaknesses such as missed candidate moves that engines alone often overlook.
- How should players conduct a post-mortem?
- Begin with the opening to note where the game left known theory, identify two or three critical moments, and jointly analyze what both sides missed while keeping a collaborative tone.
- When is the best time to hold a post-mortem?
- The discussion usually starts right after the game or soon afterward while memories remain fresh, ending with one or two concrete lessons to guide future play.
Referenced by
About the reviewer
Ben's been in love with chess since he was seven years old, when his grandfather taught him the Sicilian Defense on a well-worn board that had traveled through three generations of family game nights.